

Rangers fall to Stuttgart 3-2
By: Ian Rose | November 27th, 2007Great match on a cold night in Germany. Combined with Lyon’s 2-2 draw with Barca, Rangers are tied on points but remain in second place on head-to-head results. It all comes down to one match, December 12th at Ibrox, where a draw will be enough for Rangers, but only a win will do for Lyon.
Rangers took the early lead off of Charlie Adam in the 28th. Having just come on for the injured Lee McCulloch, Adam made his first touch count. Carlos Cuellar brilliantly headed DeMarcus Beasley’s corner to Adam’s feet, and he was able to flick it in for 1-0. Stuttgart’s Cacau was able to equalize in first-half injury time, with another deflected corner. The second half opened with another injury for Rangers, as Beasley was carted off after a collision with Stuttgart’s keeper. Pavel Pardo, the veteran from Mexico, gave Stuttgart their first lead with a low bullet that just snuck under Allan McGregor. McGregor was otherwise quite good on the night, but I really think he could have gotten to this one. Rangers got a lifeline in the 70th minute, as two Stuttgart mistakes led to a pretty pedestrian goal from Barry Ferguson. All credit to Barry for keeping his head and being in the right place at the right time, but the real surprise would have been him missing a shot like that.
Rangers looked to be taking at least a point, and were still attacking well, when Stuttgart’s Romanian striker Ciprian Marica came out of nowhere to deliver the killing blow with five minutes remaining. At about the same time, Lyon pulled even with Barcelona on Juninho’s goal, but none of it really mattered to Rangers’ advancement. Only a win here would have really helped them, and Walter Smith had to expect the situation he now finds himself in – hosting Lyon, needing a point.
On a side note, I have never understood the logic of late substitutions. Darcheville looked extremely tired and should have been replaced at about the 70th minute. When he finally did go off in the 81st for Daniel Cousin, Cousin barely had a chance to get into the match before it was over. In my opinion, if you have a player you are definitely going to replace, for the reason of fatigue, do it earlier. Fatigued players aren’t going to get a second wind in the middle of the match, and the new player, especially a lone striker, needs some time to get into the game. Far be it from me to question Walter Smith, but this decision seemed a bit off.
December 12th is already marked on my calendar. It should be a good one, and hopefully Rangers can hold on and make it through. Next up, Celtic’s match tomorrow with Shakhtar, a must-win for the Hoops.
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



The way things went over in Lyon, the Stuttgart result didn’t really hurt the Rangers. Only if Barca had kept their lead a Rangers win would have sent them through – given I remember the math behind this group correctly. This way Stuttgart served their fans a win (and I think it was a deserved victory) and we’ll get a proper final at Ibrox in December.
Posted from
Germany

-



I guess I can’t argue that Rangers deserved this win, but I’m not sure Stuttgart did either. I thought the teams were very evenly matched on the day. Both had a few nice bits of play, but really both just took advantage of the other’s mistakes. And there were a fair number of mistakes on both ends. I think a draw would have been the result most indicative of the run of play, but again, anything other than a win really doesn’t matter, aside from costing the SPL a few league coefficient points that would have been nice. Oh well. Like you said, the December match should be a nice final, and will have a cup final feel to it.
Posted from
United States

-



I enjoyed watching Stuttgart’s possession (65% vs 35%) and passing (85% vs 69% success rate) game, which is why I thought the victory was deserved. On the chances side the game was evenly matched – so yes, a draw would have been a just result from that perspective.
Posted from
Germany

-



As you mention the 5-year-ranking: wouldn’t it be ‘better’ for the Scottish league if both Celtic and Rangers continue playing in the UEFA Cup next year. Wins and draws are worth the same in both competitions and the clubs would face less dangerous competition and could thus earn more points…?
Posted from
Germany

-



You’re right when it comes down purely to coefficients. I guess what I want is what happened last season – one Scottish team in the Champions League knockouts, one in the UEFA Cup knockouts. Because I’m in the rare position of being a Scotland fan but not particularly a Rangers or Celtic fan domestically, I would prefer the CL team to be Rangers, so that Celtic don’t get too far ahead financially. Basically, I’m somewhat satisfied either way. In the CL, there’s a lot of money and a higher profile. In the UEFA Cup, you’re right, there’s a better chance to gain points for the SPL. Win-Win.
Posted from
United States

-



Ian, I’m with you, though as a Bhoys fan, I’d prefer Celtic in the CL and Rangers in UEFA Cup. Jan, I think for prestige reasons alone we need at least one team in CL, though I understand your point about points.
Posted from
United States

Comments are closed












